New Bill Could Standardize School Discipline; Leave Administrators “Powerless”

|

The California Department of Education reports that 53 percent of all suspensions fall under a “vague” loophole in state education code, known as “willful defiance” of school authorities.

There are currently nearly two-dozen designated reasons why a student can be suspended in state education code.

AB 420, introduced by Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) would amend current education code and limit the use of suspension or expulsion by school and district administrators for students who have disrupted school activities or otherwise “willfully defied” the valid authority of school personnel.

This bill would limit the authority of a superintendent of a school district or principals by only allowing a student to be suspended or recommended for expulsion on or after the third such “willful defiance” offense for middle and high school students. Elementary students would not be authorized for suspension or expulsion for willful defiance.

Supporters of AB 420 point to decades of research, which they say has confirmed that out-of-school suspension and expulsion for minor offenses fail to correct minor to moderate behavior issues. Currently the code does not address the level of severity for which a student can be suspended or expelled.

One recent study found that 9th grade students who had been suspended even once were twice as likely to drop out of school. Research conducted by the Council of State Governments shows that students who have been suspended or expelled were nearly three times as likely to have contact with the juvenile justice system within the following year, as compared to other students who weren't suspended.

Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson recently announced his support of AB 420 by tying graduation rates to school attendance.

“We must keep students in school, where we can provide them with the support and learning opportunities necessary to graduate.,” Christianson said. “That's why I’m concerned by the rate at which we’re removing students from school through suspensions for relatively minor, non-violent and/or non-drug related misbehavior. Suspensions are often necessary, particularly for violent and drug-related offenses however; the majority of suspensions in California are not for violence or drugs.

“When students are removed from school for misbehavior, it results in a missed learning opportunity, giving the students an unsupervised vacation and making them more likely to get in trouble, disengage from school, and ultimately dropout.”

According to the bill's many supporters, the willful defiance category for suspension is too broad and can encompass offenses such as not following a teacher’s directions, talking back to a teacher, not turning in work, or even the throwing of furniture. In comparison to expulsion level offenses, such as bringing a knife or firearms or drugs to school, these offenses would “be considered minor.”

Minor offenses could be remedied by anti-punitive measures such as personal reflections of positive interventions.

Opponents of AB 420, including the California Federation of Teachers and the California School Board Association, say that the bill would likely strip school officials of the vital authority to discipline unruly students or habitual classroom disruptors. Also, opponents are concerned about the resources and staffing needed to provide alternative discipline measures such as in-school suspensions and additional training for educators.

Turlock Unified School District Superintendent Sonny Da Marto did not specifically express support or opposition to AB 420. However, he acknowledged that TUSD has employed various methods to teach students appropriate campus behavior.

“We are starting a new behavior invention program based on positive
discipline,” Da Marto said. “The process focuses on students being respectful, responsible and safe. Positive Behavior Support is a school-wide approach to support and teach expected student behavior. All Turlock Unified School District students will learn and practice social behaviors that are conducive to a positive school climate. This coupled with our Character Counts program and our civility initiatives we hope to change negative behavior to positive actions.”

AB 420 went through its second reading on June 27 and was ordered for its third reading in the coming weeks.

Comments 2

  1. Another Turlock Teacher says:
    "Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable." This article is a horrible misrepresentation of Cause and Effect. I am disappointed that CA politicians would believe that we, the public, would be so easily manipulated into believing that the act of suspending a student for "willful defiance" leads to increased dropout rates. Has no-one pointed out that a student who has already displayed a blatant lack of respect for rules and/or authority (which sometimes leads to removal from a classroom or school) may already be on the path to dropping out?

    I know of no teachers in Turlock who would recommend suspension for a first offense - we have already attempted numerous strategies to bring the behavior or attitude back into acceptable norms before involving administration. What is the teacher with 34 students supposed to do with the child who is "willfully defiant" while trying to keep the other 33 students on-task and within the bounds of acceptable behavior? And how is it fair to the other 33 students to allow a student a "three-strikes" policy before holding the misbehaving student accountable?

    Looking into my magic ball: Write-ups on "minor offenses" will actually increase as teachers and administrators create the paper trail that will remove intolerably disruptive students from their class. Willful defiance will increase in the general student population as students become aware that they will have two "freebies."

    All I can imagine is that this bill, as so many others, only has dollar signs in front of it.
  2. County Office of Education says:
    Are you kidding? Stanislaus County expels more students than 52 California counties. It expels students at a rate nearly as high as San Diego County which is 6 times larger. There IS a problem. Now instead of expelling students they compel them to go on independent study. They soak up the ADA and fail to serve the student. This is a growing epidemic and something needs to be done.

    To its credit, TUSD started their Bridge Program to beginning dealing with the problem. The county continues to run horrific county schools like the zoo that exists at John B Allard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent Article Comments

Recent Forum Topics

Recent Forum Replies

ADVERTISEMENT
Skip to content