• NEWS
    • Investigative News
    • Crime
    • Politics
    • Coronavirus Live Updates
    • Archive
  • LIFE & SOCIAL
    • Lost Pet
    • Obituaries
    • Public Listings
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • FORUM
  • BUSINESS DIRECTORY
  • ADVERTISE
    • Advertising Options
  • ABOUT US
    • Contact Us
  • ACCOUNT
    • Subscriptions
    • My Profile
    • Log In
Sunday, April 18, 2021
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
TurlockCityNews.com
COVID-19 News Updates
  • NEWS
    • Investigative News
    • Crime
    • Politics
    • Coronavirus Live Updates
    • Archive
  • LIFE & SOCIAL
    • Lost Pet
    • Obituaries
    • Public Listings
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • FORUM
  • BUSINESS DIRECTORY
  • ADVERTISE
    • Advertising Options
  • ABOUT US
    • Contact Us
  • ACCOUNT
    • Subscriptions
    • My Profile
    • Log In
No Result
View All Result
TurlockCityNews.com
No Result
View All Result
Home News Politics

Turlock Council Abandons Campaign Finance Reform, Mayoral Candidate Self-Imposes Restrictions

by TCN Staff - info@turlockcitynews.com
April 13, 2014
in Politics
0 0
2
Alex Cantatore/TurlockCityNews.com|

|

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

After months of research, the Turlock City Council backed away from a campaign finance reform measure Tuesday night.

But members of council did so for different reasons: some found the measure so weak as to be toothless, while others still considered its provisions “onerous,” and said they felt as though their integrity was being questioned.

In a compromise, the council endorsed a bare bones transparency measure: all campaign finance reporting forms will now be posted on the City of Turlock website. That, at least, allows the public to verify for themselves who is taking money from whom, Turlock City Councilmember Steven Nascimento said.

"The public can hold us accountable if we're not willing to place limits on ourselves," Nascimento said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ordinance Weakened from Initial Proposal

The ordinance discussed Tuesday was significantly different – and significantly weaker – than one initially proposed by Nascimento on Feb. 11.

At that time, the ordinance, would have required councilmembers to step down from voting on any agenda item affecting any person or entity who contributed $2,000 in the past three years. Violators would have faced $500 fines and potential criminal penalties.

Such ordinances are commonly known as “tin cup” ordinances, a backronym for “Time is now, clean up politics.”

But speakers representing several major campaign backers, including the owner of Pet Extreme Matt Swanson, the Turlock firefighters’ union, and the Realtors’ association, argued against that measure. They said corruption would just be driven underground, and that any restrictions on campaign donations would be restricting free speech.

Nascimento, at the time, said it was good that those major campaign donors had issues with the ordinance.

“They should have concerns,” Nascimento said. “This will have impacts on the way they do business.”

However, councilmembers Amy Bublak and Bill DeHart objected to the ordinance, arguing it had been rushed through and needed to be reviewed. Both also had concerns that their “morals and ethics were in question,” as Bublak said.

However, a split vote of the city council sent the measure back to the drawing board, with Nascimento and Bublak meeting to draft a new ordinance.

Compromise Pleases No One

The two came back with a compromise that seemed to make no one happy.

The new ordinance would have simply required councilmembers to submit a form to the city clerk reporting any donation of $100 or more, should the council have pending business with the donor. The measure would have only brought to light any last-minute donations prior to council meetings; elected officials already must report all donations quarterly under current law.

No caps on donations or requirements to reveal donors to public audiences remained in the gutted ordinance.

The removal of a cap irked Councilmember Forrest White. He said the ordinance, as presented Tuesday, would simply add bureaucracy with little positive impact.

“This was designed to be a tin cup ordinance,” White said. “And to be quite frank it's become a tin sieve.”

And Councilman Bill DeHart still had issues with the ordinance, which he viewed as an attack on the integrity of city councilmembers. He pointed to the pre-existing, state-mandated campaign financing reporting laws, which he believes do an adequate job of informing the public.

An upset Turlock City Council eventually directed city staff to post all campaign finance forms on the city website in a further compromise, abandoning any enhanced campaign finance provisions.

“This isn't the solution,” Nascimento said. “It's a first step. But I think it's a good first step, and I look forward to continuing this conversation at a future date.”

Mayoral candidate Gary Soiseth, who previously announced plans to follow self-imposed campaign finance restrictions during the upcoming election, was unfazed by the decision. Soiseth said he will “lead by example,” accepting only $1,500 from individuals and $3,000 from farms and businesses.

“I didn't need a city ordinance to require my campaign to be transparent,” Soiseth said. “… It is my belief that this campaign's message will continue to resonate with a wide range of folks from diverse political, economic, and social backgrounds.” 

Tags: AbandonsCampaignCouncilFinanceImposedReformRestrictionsSelf
Previous Post

THS Celebrates First Annual Spring Carnival

Next Post

Around Turlock – April 12

Next Post
Submitted by Brad Treadwell/TurlockCityNews.com|

Around Turlock - April 12

Comments 2

  1. Sosieth will be bought & sold by the same folks who own Bublak & De Hart says:
    7 years ago

    Why is Sosieth telling people he went to Afghanistan, yes, but not as a soldier, but as a USDA rep. to help Afghan farmers. Sosieth is only telling “part” of his story. He has a photo in camo, is that shot in Kandahar or on his “farm” in east Turlock? Taking $1500 or $3000 from one individual, “farmer” or business owner is too much. Matt Swanson who did not have the courage to speak out again campaign finance reform, Mark Hall, Mike Warda all are smiling. Andre should have picked a better candidate.

    Reply
  2. Steven, Bring Back Campaign Finance Reform says:
    7 years ago

    It is a bit ironic. Bublak who is under serious investigation and has complaints filed against her with the FPPC in the 2008 election, is throwing a fit about the “tin cup” ordinance and making all donors transparent. The “cop” has much to hide does she? DeHart took 16K from the Turlock Fire Fighters union, and dare not vote against any changes to their “contract”. DeHart raised 26K total in the 2010 race, only 10K from Turlock citizens. Isn’t it ironic.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

  • 안전카지노 on Kaepernick Loses in Semifinals of Madden Cover Vote
  • koi cbd zen on THS Class of 2014 Looks to Build On Experiences
  • Lamadrid on Subject Found in Shoplifter’s Vehicle with Meth, Both Arrested
  • film on Harder Campaign Denies Alleged Slander Against Howze, But There’s a Recording

LEARN MORE

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

About Us

ADVERTISING

Advertising Options

Place Obituary

Place Lost Pet

TAKE US WITH YOU

Subscribe

Community Forum

More Coming Soon …

© 2021 TurlockCityNews.com | Anything & Everything Turlock

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe
    • Subscriptions
    • Advertise with Us
  • Login
  • Home
  • News
    • Coronavirus Live Updates
  • Life & Social
  • Crime
  • Around Turlock
  • Events & Entertainment
  • Obituaries
  • Lost Pet
  • Job Watch
  • Campus News
  • Local Vocals
  • Investigative News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In