FEATURES:    LOST PETS   |  JOB WATCH  |  LOCAL VOCALS  |  OBITUARIES  |  COMMENTS   |  AROUND TURLOCK   |  COMMUNITY POSTS  |  CAMPUS NEWS
  

        
Order by
Advanced Search
Tuesday, 30 September 2014 10:19

Road Tax Committee Fails to Disclose Contributions on Time, Includes Road Contractor

Written by 
Road Tax Committee Fails to Disclose Contributions on Time, Includes Road Contractor www.FixTurlockRoads.com
The Citizens for Yes on Measure B, the committee that has filed in support of the half-cent road tax that will be on the November ballot, has reported a large sum of contributions, however were delayed in their reporting.

Measure B is a half-cent sales tax that is intended to benefit Turlock roads. The road tax is estimated to generate approximately $5.6 million per year, and $39.2 million over the seven-year life of the tax.

On Sept. 19, the committee, which names Kevin Berger as Treasurer, reported receiving six new contributions of $1,000 or more, between Aug. 11 and Sept. 19, totaling $15,500.

Per Fair Political Practices Commission requirements, political candidates and committees are required to report any contributions of $1,000 or more within 24 hours.

Four of the six contributions, which were received between Aug. 11 and 22, were reported late. The contributions are as follows:
  • $2,500 from A. Teichert & Son, Inc., out of Sacramento, on Aug. 11
  • $1,000 from Northern California District Council of Laborers Issues PAC, out of Sacramento, on Aug. 15
  • $1,000 from Turlock Walnut Company on Aug. 22
  • $1,000 from Turlock Scavenger Co. on Aug. 25
  • $5,000 from Realtors Alliance for Proper Planning, out of Lathrop, on Sept. 18
  • $5,000 from Northern California Carpenters Regional Council Issues KPAC, out of Oakland, on Sept. 19

Citizens for Yes on Measure B Committee Chairman and Head of the Steering Committee Jim Theis attributes the late reporting to the committee having outdated reporting requirements.

“The reporting delay was a result of our volunteer committee having outdated reporting instructions,” said Theis. “When the Turlock City News article appeared on reporting deadlines, the City was contacted and updated guidelines were obtained and the necessary forms were filed. Reporting is now current.”

On Sept. 19, TurlockCityNews.com published an article informing the public of the 24 hours contribution reporting period, that went into effect Jan. 1, 2013, and donations received by Mayoral candidate Gary Soiseth and City Council incumber Forrest White.

The Citizens for Yes on Measure B reported their contributions on the same day that the TurlockCityNews.com article was published.

However, the Citizens for Yes on Measure B are not the only ones to fall victim to the FPPC regulations this election season. On Sept. 23, Mayoral candidate Mike Brem reported eight contributions, each $1,000 or more, totalling $17,000, each of which failed to be reported within the required 24 hours.

Brem also said that the failure to report the contributions per FPPC requirements were due to having outdated information.

Per FPPC regulations, late contribution reports can result in a penalty of anything from a warning letter to the maximum $5,000 fine for each late report.

“Of course, it all depends on the facts and specifics of each case,” FPPC spokesperson Jay Wierenga previously said.

The Supporters for a Better San Clemente and Jeanne O’Grady were fined a total of $2,500 for failing to report a contribution of $2,111 to the City Clerk within 24 hours in October 2010, according to the FPPC website.

According to Turlock City Clerk Kellie Weaver, the late reporting could be an honest oversight for a committee or Political Action Committee, as the FPPC website can be confusing.

Candidates filing to run for Council or Mayor meet for approximately an hour with Weaver to go over documents, forms, requirements, etc. when they pull papers to run, however committees, PACs, and treasurers do not.

“It would be different for me if it was one of the candidates,” said Weaver. “If it were one of the candidates that acted as their own treasurer, I would say, ‘Hold on, I gave you that information.’”

The FPPC website still has an older version of the of the manual that states contributions received or made of $1,000 or more must be reported within 24 hours during the 16 days before the election. The website does however have a section detailing changes made to the manual, which includes the change in 24-hour reporting from 16 days within the election to within 90 days of the election.

“I honestly can see how someone who didn’t come in for training with me could just be looking at the manual,” said Weaver. “... To me there’s a little bit of grey area there, there’s a little bit of confusion.”

Weaver added that she provides the candidates with a large binder of information that includes the FPPC forms as they are, as she cannot change the forms, but does also include the form with the changes.

Due to the recent late reporting by some groups, Weaver said she sent a reminder to all candidates and committees of the reporting requirements.

“I wanted to make sure everyone had that correct, updated information, so I did send this form out to all of them last week,” said Weaver.

Of the six contributions reported by the Citizens for Yes on Measure B, only two were from Turlock companies or committees.

Listed under the contributions is a $2,500 donation from Teichert Construction, Inc., who has done several repaving projects in Turlock recently. They were awarded the Monte Vista Avenue repaving project in September 2013, as well as several other repaving projects.

According to the Teichert Construction, Inc. website, the company is a “general contractor that builds the infrastructure most people use every day, including hundreds of thousands of miles of roads, sidewalks, freeways, curbs, utility trenches, and gutters.” 


Related Articles:
City of Turlock Sends Insert by Citizens for Yes on Measure B in Utility Bills, Both Say It Was Only Informational

Brem Fails to Report $17K in Contributions Per Fair Political Practices Commission Requirements

FOX40 News Video: Some Turlock Residents Say City is Trying to Tell them How to Vote

Comments (5)

  1. Modesto Bee support why

Modesto Bee is pushing this on Turlock Voters and all this lying and scandal is tied to Mike Brem, The Turlock Chamber of Commerce, Mayor John Lazar and the city of Turlock. Why does Modesto care about taxing citizens more and telling voters with...

Modesto Bee is pushing this on Turlock Voters and all this lying and scandal is tied to Mike Brem, The Turlock Chamber of Commerce, Mayor John Lazar and the city of Turlock. Why does Modesto care about taxing citizens more and telling voters with their news how to vote for the tax and to vote for Brem for mayor? What do they know about Turlock? Something is fishy and I'm glad that Turlock City News is following the money.

This is 3 times laws have been broken and all involve Mike Brem, the road tax, The Turlock Chamber of Commerce, the city of Turlock, Mayor John Lazar, Steven Nascimento and Jim Theis. This needs to stop.

Read More
  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Turlock news

The Modesto Bee also covers Turlock and it a better news source than this trashy website.

I won't believe it until I see it modbee.com. If this is as bad as it looks they will do an investigative news report on it. I don't trust the Turlock...

The Modesto Bee also covers Turlock and it a better news source than this trashy website.

I won't believe it until I see it modbee.com. If this is as bad as it looks they will do an investigative news report on it. I don't trust the Turlock Urninal to deliver any news or popular stories either.

Read More
  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. What's the story?

Late paperwork? Doesn't look like they were trying to hide anything.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Keith

Why should we pay higher taxes for roads? Maybe we should staff our police and fire stations better before talking about road work!

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. How Interesting

Just looking at the contributors' names, you see that 5 out of 6 directly benefit financially with new work or commissions by this measure passing.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location