FEATURES:    LOST PETS   |  JOB WATCH  |  LOCAL VOCALS  |  OBITUARIES  |  COMMENTS   |  AROUND TURLOCK   |  COMMUNITY POSTS  |  CAMPUS NEWS
  

        
ADVERTISEMENT - ARTICLE CONTINUED BELOW
Monte Vista Vet dental month 2017 header 11 12 17
Order by
Advanced Search
Sunday, 02 November 2014 21:02

Rob Santos, DVM: Why I STILL oppose the California Water Bond

Written by  Rob Santos, DVM
Dr. Rob Santos, Turlock Irrigation District Boardmember and veterinarian at Monte Vista Small Animal Hospital Dr. Rob Santos, Turlock Irrigation District Boardmember and veterinarian at Monte Vista Small Animal Hospital Courtesy of Dr. Rob Santos, DVM
The following is Op-Ed by Turlock Irrigation District Boardmember and veterinarian at Monte Vista Small Animal Hospital, Dr. Rob Santos.

After sharing my concerns about Proposition 1, the California Water Bond, several prominent proponents of the Bond presented their opposing viewpoints. Public debate is wonderful, and I appreciate the chance to engage in this type of conversation. I want to address two particular op-ed pieces.

The first, “Why the Water Bond Must Pass,” by Mike Dunbar correctly points out that while he and I agree on how the Bay Delta Conservation Plan will affect our area, we draw very different conclusions about how the Water Bond may impact the BDCP (The BDCP is a set of 22 conservation measures designed to restore the Delta ecosystem while at the same time constructing two massive underground tunnels that will take water from the Sacramento River and deliver it to Southern California). Mike omits an important fact about the Water Bond, and it is a crucial point in explaining why we draw different conclusions.
ADVERTISEMENT - ARTICLE CONTINUED BELOW
Monte Vista Vet dental month 2017 big 11 12 17

Fact: The Water Bond funds the BDCP.

Money from the water bond is earmarked for the conservation measures in the BDCP. In fact, the BDCP names the Water Bond as its first source of state funding. And as I’ve already argued, funding the BDCP conservation measures is a crucial step toward constructing the twin tunnels, which will require TID/MID to give up a minimum of 500,000 acre feet of surface water per year to support the Delta ecology.

When the State comes calling for more water from the Tuolumne, I truly wonder how our local politicians, newspapers, and other organization leaders who stood side-by-side with the Governor in support of the Water Bond will be able to credibly oppose the BDCP. Maybe I don’t understand Sacramento logic, but it makes no sense to me how anyone can be opposed to the BDCP while at the same time also be in favor of a bond that funds the BDCP. We simply can’t have our cake and eat it too.

According to the Modesto Bee, the Governor “promised” our local politicians that he would “advocate for reasonable, incremental flow increases on the Tuolumne, Merced and Stanislaus rivers instead of the doubling or tripling of flows sought by the State Water Resources Control Board.” Of course it isn’t in writing and it isn’t part of the Water Bond, but our local politicians believe the Governor will keep his word. I wonder how they felt about the answers he gave this week while stumping in Modesto for the Water Bond. When pressed about the connection between the Water Bond and BDCP the Governor said the bond was tunnel-neutral and that he didn’t want to “’complexify these propositions’ with ‘tangents.’” And according to the Bee, “He gave a fuzzier response when asked about senior water rights, saying, ‘It’s a matter of law.’”
ADVERTISEMENT - ARTICLE CONTINUED BELOW
Backyard Sports Academy basic logo small banner 05 01 11 (2)

If there is one thing I have unfortunately learned in politics it is that promises are made for breaking. I know our local politicians have worked hard to get this water bond created, and if it passes I truly hope that Governor Brown proves me wrong and upholds the promise he made to them.

The second op-ed piece, written by Anthony Cannella and Adam Gray, argues that the Water Bond is “essential to our quality of life in the Valley.” I would love for them to provide the specific examples of how it will help us in the TID district. There is one thing I do know: The water storage projects will not increase water for TID farmers. Though the Governor says they have not yet picked where the water storage money will be spent, the assumption is that that it will go toward the construction of Sites Reservoir off the Sacramento River and Temperance Flat Reservoir on the San Joaquin River. So we will not get more storage and will be asked to give up more water. It just doesn’t seem like a fair trade.

For a list of specific water bond provision click here.
ADVERTISEMENT - ARTICLE CONTINUED BELOW
Monte Vista Vet dental month 2017 header 11 12 17

Comments (13)

  1. YES!

Vote santos. The only common sense choice.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Santos

He's got my vote )

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Water bill, no thanks.

i will never vote for more bonds or taxes including proposition b

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. 46

vote NOOOO on 46 it is bad for doctors

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. No on B, No on Water Bill

No more taxes. Let's get accountable government. Vote Soiseth, No on B, No on Water Bond. Period. Send the rest of the ballot empty for all I care.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. rates

we in a drought and you are not want to supporting water storage wait until rate go up . then what will you do?/

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Felecia

Did you read the article? This Water Bond will provide no water storage for our area and it will support taking more of our water. Our rates will go up because of that.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Re: Felicia

Thank you!

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Re: rates

Rates go up if Water Bond passes.

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
  1. Never In My Life

Will I VOTE to pay more taxes. Money hungry politicians all they want is more of our hard earned money to waste. Bravo Santos for taking a stand!

  Attachments
Your account does not have privileges to view attachments in the comment
 
There are no comments posted here yet
Load More

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location